Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 641 - 660
of 10,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 7:31 am
Century 21 was also entitled to a permanent injunction because of the loss of control over and harm to its marks. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
Gallo asserted that Fine's mark FALCON for distilled spirits was likely to cause confusion with Gallo's registered mark FALCON RIDGE for wine. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:45 am
Lawsuits take time – sometimes years – and if an infringer is allowed to keep using a mark while the litigation moves along, the plaintiff’s brand could continue to suffer enough harm that winning the lawsuit may be a hollow victory. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm
Ford is therefore suing for irreparable harm suffered; claiming unspecified damages and injunctive relief (see The Times here). [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
” PepperBall Technologies sold live rounds in a red shell, as well as other projectiles in different colors, such as green marking rounds and clear training rounds.PBT’s PepperBall mark became incontestable. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm
Could it therefore be a good idea to empower non-economic actors to stop the registration and/or use of certain indicia in a socially harmful manner? [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
Then again, if this plaintiff still has the markings more than three years after her first wear, maybe her situation is, indeed, unique. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 11:41 am
These highly harmful, high-end enablers of tax evasion were previously thought to be beyond the reach of the member countries. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
” The NCAA doesn’t cite much more information and does not even allege the degree of similarity between the marks, relatedness of goods or services, or harm supposedly caused by the Big Ten’s intended use of the mark. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
” The NCAA doesn’t cite much more information and does not even allege the degree of similarity between the marks, relatedness of goods or services, or harm supposedly caused by the Big Ten’s intended use of the mark. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
” The NCAA doesn’t cite much more information and does not even allege the degree of similarity between the marks, relatedness of goods or services, or harm supposedly caused by the Big Ten’s intended use of the mark. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
” The NCAA doesn’t cite much more information and does not even allege the degree of similarity between the marks, relatedness of goods or services, or harm supposedly caused by the Big Ten’s intended use of the mark. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:46 am
Mark D. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:43 am
One can argue whether it works as a deterrent, but at least it would not harm them.UPDATE:Mr Mike Marks gives the answer to the question why it does not help to have won a judgement in Taiwan here. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
During a food safety assessment, FSIS inspectors discovered the product was susceptible to environmental pathogens that make it potentially harmful if consumed. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:58 am
Luxottica showed irreparable harm based upon the confusion created by defendant’s infringing activities and the balance of harms favored Luxottica. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
But plain packaging seems to be rooted on the idea that trade marks harm consumer welfare and that consumers are somehow better off if they appear much less on the goods. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:05 am
Second Circuit reverses, noting that the false advertising prong is much broader, applying to any false statement containing an unauthorized use of a mark, which statement may harm plaintiff (and notes that it has recognized 'satisfied customer' cases as recently as 2003. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
So defendants filed a counterclaim alleging abuse of legal process and conspiracy to harm Bullseye competitively and to infringe its constitutional rights. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:17 am
Upon reviewing the record as a whole, we find that additional evidence exists that should have been considered in the court of appeals’s harm analysis, as is required by [our previous caselaw].With that, the CCA remanded the case back to the 3rd Court of Appeals to conduct a full harm analysis. [read post]
