Search for: "Mark Strong"
Results 641 - 660
of 10,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Applicants' representative confirmed that Applicants chose their mark because of its strong association with BLACKBERRY. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, in a split decision.The TTAB had sustained B&B's opposition to registration of the "Sealtite" mark on the ground of likelihood of confusion with B&B's mark. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
Although Petitioner MacNeil Automotive's mark PLATEFRAME for license plate frames is a weak mark, the Board granted this petition to cancel the mark "PRETTYPLATEFRAMES" for the same goods, on the ground of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
The opposer’s FOCUS mark was commercially strong, the parties’ marks were similar, and would be used on overlapping services. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
The opposer’s FOCUS mark was commercially strong, the parties’ marks were similar, and would be used on overlapping services. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
The post <strong>High Profile Debate Over Corporate DEI Efforts</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
The post <strong>High Profile Debate Over Corporate DEI Efforts</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:41 am
The evidence supported the Board's finding that IBI's FOCUS mark is inherently and commercially strong, albeit not famous. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:40 am
The question was whether applicant has made a sufficient showing that the mark would be perceived as a double entendre.The Board pointed out that, since applicant's goods are coolers, any argument about "the ability of an alleged double entendre to overcome the bar of Section 2(e)(1) must be strong." [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 3:29 am
The Board took the parties to task for various procedural/evidentiary missteps, tossed out Applicant Pharmavite's Morehouse defense, and painstakingly applied the DuPont factors to find Opposer's mark NATURE MADE to be conceptually weak but commercially moderately strong, the involved marks highly similar, the goods overlapping or related, and the channels of trade and classes of consumers identical or overlapping. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:00 am
Akea, LLC, Opposition No. 91196527 (May 2, 2014) [precedential].Likelihood of confusion: The Board found that, for Section 2(d) purposes, the mark IKEA is famous for "retail store services in the field of furniture, housewares and home furnishings," and is otherwise a strong mark for furniture, housewares, home furnishing, food products, and restaurant services. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:31 am
Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) introduced the parallel Senate bill, S. 2295, in June with 46 other original cosponsors. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:45 am
Nonetheless, the Board found it to be a "strong" mark, apparently based on its arbitrariness for wine: "corvo" means "raven" in Italian, and there was no evidence of third-party use that would suggest that the word has any meaning for wine.As to the marks, the Board noted that since Opposer's mark is registered in standard character form, it is "entitled" to use it in any form. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:05 am
"As to the commercial strength of the CLASSIC CANADIAN mark, there was insufficient evidence of consumer exposure to establish that it is a strong mark. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:30 am
The post <strong>Inclusivity and Innovation: Matthew Coons’ Impactful Career at Xero</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:36 am
In sum, applicant failed to show that VITALFLORA is a weak mark that is not entitled to a normal scope of protection.Even assuming VITALFLORA is weak, the Board observed, "likelihood of confusion is to be avoided, as much between 'weak' marks as between 'strong' marks. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
The Board concluded that the mark is inherently distinctive and has conceptual strength.With regard to marketplace strength, the Board found the M&G mark to be "at least somewhat commercially strong in the legal services market," based on sales, advertising, and length of use. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
The Board found that "SMOK," the "family feature" of Shenzhen's alleged family of marks, is descriptive of the goods, and therefore Shenzhen must make a "strong showing" of acquired distinctiveness for "SMOK" to quality as a family feature. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:59 am
" The Board observed, moreover, that consumers often use shortened forms of names, and "it is possible that Applicant and its services are referred to as 'Good Will.'" The presence of the words "LEGION OF" in applicant's mark "does not significantly diminish the strong similarities in connotation and overall commercial impression engendered by these two marks. [read post]
