Search for: "Mark Tushnet" Results 641 - 660 of 975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2007, 7:56 am
I am hopeful that someone, perhaps from this list (or elsewhere), might have a few opinions on the subject:Marty Schwimmer;Greg Beck (Public Citizen)IP Law Blog;John Welch;William Patry;Brian Higgins;Ron Coleman;Legal Fixtion;IP Law Observer;Internet Cases;Erik HeelsRebecca Tushnet;Michael Atkins(Eric Turkewitz is most definitely not in the car rental business.)Update, 10/29/07: Dear Avis (A Public Response To Your Trademark Complaint On My Blog) [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:32 am by Paul Horwitz
Rev. 1095 (2005); Robert Post, who in a forthcoming book discusses the place of knowledge-generation within First Amendment law; and Mark Tushnet, whose recent paper on the Stolen Valor Act discusses “the constitutionality of regulating false statements of fact. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:52 pm by Christine Hurt
  In case you think this is an important criteria for being on the Supreme Court, here's Eugene Volokh, Brian Leiter, Paul Campos, Mark Tushnet. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
Consider Michael Klarman’s view that the Court rarely challenges an existing national political consensus or Mark Tushnet’s advice to “take the Constitution away from the courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 9:59 pm
This is truly what Mark Tushnet has described as "constitutional hardball," and yet the legislature apparently is unaware that the game, like Congress itself, is being played. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:34 pm
Edwin Baker, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Mark Hart, Sole Practitioner: Appellate Law; Kenneth Karst, UCLA School of Law; Robert Myers, Newman, Aaronson & Vanaman; Stanley Goldman, Loyola Law School Los Angeles; Gerald Uelmen, Santa Clara University School of Law Presentation to Steven Shiffrin of the Christopher N. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:29 am by Lawrence Solum
PANELISTS: • Carl Bogus, Roger Williams University School of Law • Courtney Cahill, Roger Williams University School of Law • Steven Calabresi, Northwestern University School of Law • William Forbath, University of Texas School of Law • Douglas NeJaime, Loyola Law School Los Angeles • Reva Siegel, Yale Law School • Lawrence Solum, Georgetown Law School • Ilya Somin, George Mason University School of Law • Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law… [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:19 am
Some hard-core legal realists (I have in mind Jack Balkin and Mark Tushnet but there were others) took the case as simply confirming what they had always thought: that judges make political decisions. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 7:48 am by Ron Coleman
Mark Tushnet Professor of Constitutional Law, Georgetown University Perhaps he’s overstated it, though probably not as much as those interviewed in this New York Law Journal article (subscription required) think he did, but as I said in an email to Doug: “I haven’t read your book but appreciate the buzz it’s generated. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:07 am by Mark Fenster
I mention this now because this semester I'm teaching an upper division Legislation/ Regulation and have been using a really interesting casebook edited by Lisa Heinzerling and Mark Tushnet, The final reading in the book is from a 1990 Gerald Frug article in which he argues that those who assume that people can't govern themselves, and as a result prefer the delegation of authority to expert, bureaucratic officials, harbor unexamined and uncritical anti-democratic… [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 10:42 am by Iantha Haight
Other chapters cover specific nations, methodology, and specific legal concepts.Scholarship Comparative Constitutional Law: Elgar Research Reviews in Law (2017): Written by respected scholar Mark Tushnet, this book covers the most important scholarship from comparative constitutional law through 2016. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:11 am
State Action in 2020Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School8. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:40 am
Otherwise, as Mark Tushnet argues, a circuit judge who interpreted a statute five years ago would have to recuse herself now when a different circuit created a split that the Supreme Court was called on to resolve. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 8:46 am
Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law SchoolAlexander Tsesis presents a full, thoughtful, and readable history of civil rights in the United States--an outstanding account from the optimistic, liberal perspective that modern advances are the working out of the egalitarian vision of the American founders. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:42 pm
Mark Tushnet of Harvard Law School, whose recent book, "A Court Divided," explored the differences among Republican-appointed members of the Rehnquist court, said that "a consolidated conservative majority, not a divided conservative majority," was now in charge. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm by Orin Kerr
ANOTHER UPDATE: Over at Balkinization, Mark Tushnet has a very interesting post that includes a report on the rumors he heard after the argument, specifically sourced to a law clerk: Within a couple of weeks of the arguments, I heard a rumor, sourced to a law clerk, that the Court had voted to strike the ACA down. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet has written that “the fights over the Second Amendment are really about something else…about how we understand ourselves as Americans. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
In The New York Review of Books, David Cole reviews three recent books on the Roberts Court – Uncertain Justice (by Laurence Tribe and former SCOTUSblog contributor Joshua Matz), In the Balance (by Mark Tushnet), and Scalia (by Bruce Murphy) – and concludes that “what most defines the Roberts Court may be its hostility to courts themselves. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:02 am by Paul Horwitz
 It's an issue I hope to start working on soon, and it has drawn a good deal of recent attention from some of the top First Amendment scholars, including Eugene Volokh, Mark Tushnet, Ashutosh Bhagwat, and others. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 4:02 am
Harvard Law Prof Mark Tushnet (the moderator) and GW Law Prof Bob Cottrol (from the audience) thought that a victory for Heller would be good for Democratic politicians and gun control advocates, who could then claim credibly that the gun control measures they favor are not in fact the first step on a slippery slope to abolition. [read post]