Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law" Results 641 - 660 of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Bath Marine Draftsmen’s 5 156 NLRB 411 (1965), enfd. 376 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 843 (1967). [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Granting certiorari (or “granting cert” for the really cool hipster lawyers) means that the Supreme Court will hear the matter. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Adam Chan
However, she recommended against granting cert, claiming that the “Court’s review would be premature. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Less explicit cases occur where the Court lobbies the political branches for more resources or uses constitutional law to approve the creation of institutions that take over routine workload from the Court, thus freeing up its time and attention for more consequential matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:03 am by Peter Spiro - Guest
  Finally, on the cert. question, it’s also no small matter that the Court is just coming off of Whiting, its first decision in more than thirty years to touch on the relationship of federalism and immigration enforcement. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
As a practical matter, this is a much more important case than Rahimi (which itself is quite important). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
In our amicus brief, Michael McConnell, I, and a group of other constitutional law scholars argued that no matter what your theory of constitutional intepretation, the recess appointments were invalid. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
The state’s Brief in Opposition had argued that it would be better to review a different case in which the exclusionary rule issue was also part of the case, a position the Justices presumably weighed before granting cert on just the rights question. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am by Eugene Volokh
Courts treat "commercial speech" as somewhat less protected than other speech; the scope of that carve-out is a matter of dispute. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am by Orin Kerr
It’s there, not in the context of a cross-border shooting, that the Fourth Amendment question in Hernandez seems to matter most. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:31 am by SHG
Was it so bad that, after granting cert, one of the nine benchslapped him from across town? [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
The Chief Justice wanted to hear the cases and was so upset when a majority of his colleagues refused to do so that he prepared a dissent from the denial of cert. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:21 am by Andrew Keane Woods
  But the message this decision sends is: “what matters is the location of the data. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am by Andrew Kent
"  No matter what the precise facts turn out to be, it seems certain that a terrible tragedy occurred. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm by Orin Kerr
The matter may very well get resolved in the lower courts without the Supreme Court stepping in. [read post]