Search for: "Matter of Goldstein"
Results 641 - 660
of 974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2012, 6:59 am
Goldstein. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
A Thanks: All of the case briefs and argument documents are neatly packaged by Tom Goldstein and Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in the matter of Christopher v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the petitioner in Florence.] [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:32 pm
Goldstein's prognosis? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
(Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents Moncrieffe.) [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:52 pm
With a Chapter 13 case, I need to know a few other matters, such as car loans and tax debt and credit card debt. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:32 am
After Tom Goldstein's painful oral argument, it was a fait accompli. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
This post portrayed just a fraction of what's in these three pieces, so those with more than a passing interest in such matters should read them for yourselves. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:18 pm
And because all debtors have an absolute duty to disclose matters truthfully, let's just say that it wouldn't look too good at that point! [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:25 am
GOLDSTEIN, COPYRIGHT § 9.4 at 162 (1989) (“the standard rationale for excluding innocence as a defense to copyright infringement is that, as between the copyright owner and the infringer, the infringer is better placed to guard against mistake”; “the strict liability rule should discipline an infringer, who might otherwise mistakenly conclude that his copying will not infringe the copyrighted work, to evaluate the legal consequences of his conduct more… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:10 pm
The truth of the matter is simply the complete opposite. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:40 am
And we will sing it year after year, no matter how history disposes of us, just so long as we are still around. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
As a threshold matter, the text of the Appointments Clause suggests, and the Supreme Court has confirmed, that Departments refer only to agencies within the Executive branch of the government.7 But which executive agencies? [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:18 am
Hughes Hubbard: Critical matters. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
LSUC is quite another matter and is really remarkable for its chutzpah and hubris. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
And third, even if no issues of fact remain, my client, the defendant, is entitled to judgement as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Paul Goldstein has a recent short paper: it should be what the author says it is. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:38 am
[Link] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox is looking for electrical IP attorneys with 1-4 years of experience to work in their DC office. [read post]
