Search for: "Matter of Jonathan H."
Results 641 - 660
of 877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
As a practical matter, however, it also means this case will hang around for awhile. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 6:42 pm
On the matter of qualified immunity, Judge Mathis wrote: Defendants argue that they are entitled to qualified immunity for two main reasons. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm
Nor, for that matter, does a defendant have an adequate opportunity to assert constitutional violations in the state proceeding when the prosecution itself is the constitutional violation. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 1:21 pm
According to new reports, thirteen progressive groups, including Black Lives Matter and the Sunrise Foundation, will endorse a full-page ad in Politico calling upon Breyer to take leave from the bench. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:13 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
After all, they did play a significant role in the matter, from the initial charging decisions to conviction and punishment. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
They contend that state law suits about interstate emissions are barred by federal common law as a jurisdictional matter, and therefore that the District's complaint must be understood as bringing a federal common law action. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
Gorsuch goes on: To make matters worse, the law before us carries the possibility of criminal sanctions. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:00 pm
Jerry H. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
In procedural matters, this Court has, time and again, sided with the employer (Genesis Healthcare: offers of judgment mooting wage and hour collective actions; Comcast v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
War by Other Means: Mercantilism and Free Trade in the Age of the American RevolutionELIGA H. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:30 am
"Of course H-Net also has several new reviews up this week. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 3:37 am
All that matters is whether the practice causes the defendant-wrongdoer to internalize the social costs of its actions. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
(H/t Althouse). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
(In the majority’s opinion in Malesko, then-Chief Justice William H. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 10:32 am
So one could argue (and I expect the Trump administration will argue) that whether the president is abiding by the emoluments clause is just the sort of matter that respects the nation as a whole and is not fit for judicial review. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:23 am
What actually matters in this case is that the sponsor of the event (TFAS) is not a party to any litigation likely to reach the court. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 4:09 pm
As in Regents, the fact that the agency action relied upon may have been arbitrary or unlawful does not matter. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 11:04 am
So there was no indication that the pros and cons of rescinding DACA, as a matter of immigration policy, had been considered at all. [read post]
