Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 118,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
The decision may also open the door for further state regulation regarding reproductive rights. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
The decision may also open the door for further state regulation regarding reproductive rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:45 pm
Since in past cases, like United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:05 pm
"A defendant charged with felony DUI may move to dismiss the charge by alleging that the state is improperly relying on a prior uncounseled misdemeanor DUI conviction," the Court ruled, citing the state Supreme Court's 2008 decision in State v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 12:56 pm
Fund v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 5:37 am
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:55 am
Unlike Chevron, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 8:43 pm
Catsouras v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
Mays v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 3:26 pm
State v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:47 pm
BREAKING A week ago, on May 10th, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Indiana Department of State Revenue v.... [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 12:12 pm
On May 4, 2007, Wise entered his pleas ... [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:48 am
A few weeks ago, in United States v Nesbeth (15 CR-18, EDNY, May 24, 2016) Judge Frederic Block wrote an important opinion on the effect of post-conviction collateral consequences on one convicted of a felony, and as a result of... [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:54 pm
" [Wilsey v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
Continuing with this blog’s coverage of the recently concluded Supreme Court term, I’ll offer a few thoughts on the decision in Bond v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:05 am
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 870, 875-876 (1989) and Peretz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:32 pm
The post Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:03 am
Moreover, the United States Supreme Court had held, in Fong Foo v. [read post]