Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration" Results 641 - 660 of 2,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2015, 1:56 pm by Gregory Dell
Plaintiff was found totally disabled by the Social Security Administration one year after Anthem terminated his benefits. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 1:56 pm by Gregorgy Dell
Plaintiff was found totally disabled by the Social Security Administration one year after Anthem terminated his benefits. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
According to OCR, its investigation of the complaint revealed among other things that: SEMC improperly disclosed the PHI of at least 1,093 individuals; SEMC failed to implement sufficient security measures regarding the transmission of and storage of ePHI to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable and appropriate level; and SEMC failed to timely identify and respond to a known security incident, mitigate the harmful effects of the security incident, and document… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:25 pm by PaulKostro
Div. 2001), the Appellate Division held that a family court adjudicating support obligations must give appropriate deference to a determination by the Social Security Administration (SSA) that a party is disabled. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm by Amy Howe
Berryhill (March 18): Whether, if the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council determines that an appeal from an administrative decision by an individual seeking disability benefits is filed too late, that ruling is a “final decision” that courts can review Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Pekoske to head the Transportation Security Administration. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:30 am by Keith R. McMurdy
  There are locator services through the IRS Letter Forwarding program and Social Security that a plan administrator should use as proof they tried. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:14 am
  On May 15, 2008, the Social Security Administration finally nationalized the rule adopted by the court and issued a new regulation, modifying 20 CFR 416.1160. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Gregory Dell
Next, the court found that, “Although plaintiff is correct that failing to consider the Social Security Administration’s finding of disability may be evidence of arbitrary decision-making, a plan administrator is not forever bound by that determination. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Gregory Dell
Next, the court found that, “Although plaintiff is correct that failing to consider the Social Security Administration’s finding of disability may be evidence of arbitrary decision-making, a plan administrator is not forever bound by that determination. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
But the lie v. lie scenario also serves to make those who mean well and desire more humane outcomes incapable of grasping why their feelings aren’t embraced by anyone outside their fringe. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am by centerforartlaw
” The article aims to ensure that the “fundamental duties of political, economic, and social solidarity” are fulfilled. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:46 am by Susan I. Nelson
Citizen and Immigration Services and compares the information that workers submit to an employer on an I-9 — the federal document that collects employment-eligibility information — to records maintained by the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
Indeed, the more than 12,000 agency adjudicators scattered across the federal government collectively issue millions of decisions per year on subjects ranging from Social Security and veterans benefits to immigration and patent rights. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Venkat
On the other hand, if users post content to social networking sites “using more secure privacy settings, [this] reflect[s] the user’s intent to preserve information as private” and may engender Fourth Amendment protection. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]