Search for: "Merrick v. Merrick" Results 641 - 660 of 677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13]  As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Center Great Plains Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center University of Missouri/Columbia 100 Corporate Lake Drive Columbia, MO 65203 Phone: (573) 882-3600 (V/TTY); (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: ada@missouri.edu Web: http://www.adaproject.org ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY Technology-Related Assistance Nebraska Assistive Technology Partnership 5143 South 48th Street, Suite C Lincoln, NE 68516-2204 Phone: (402) 471-0734 (V/TTY); (888) 806-6287… [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
The late Justice Antonin Scalia and the vacancy he left behind continued to loom large over the justices’ summer appearances, as his colleagues were often called upon to speak about his legacy, their memories of serving with him, and their thoughts on adjusting to an eight-member Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 12:36 pm by Adam Feldman
This week, Kennedy authored the majority opinion in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
When Republicans threatened to filibuster any of those potential appointees, Clinton decided to go with Judge Merrick Garland, thinking (as President Obama had thought a year earlier) that nominating a clear centrist who was older than most potential nominees would create bipartisan agreement, especially during these unsettled times.Instead, McConnell and Senator Susan Collins announced that Clinton should have picked someone more acceptable to Republicans, as a show of good faith from a… [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Ryan Goodman
Put all these things together and it is clear that Merrick Garland would have grounds to seek indictments and would be able to deflect any argument that the participants in the seditious conspiracy lacked criminal intent. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
In lieu of our regular Friday feature—the Week in Review—The Regulatory Review is recapping some of the top regulatory news from the past year, including the coronavirus pandemic, the 2020 presidential election, and more. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
“I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
The Justice Department’s filing Tuesday evening in former President Trump’s federal court effort to slow the Mar-a-Lago investigation presents a remarkable show of strength and confidence in the ongoing probe. [read post]