Search for: "Michael V. Minor"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Bologna v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm
JUDKINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
With the exception of college-educated women driven to the polls by the Supreme Court’s recent overruling of Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am
Michael Beuke is due to be poisioned. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Consider that the lawyer Trump hired to defend him against a charge that he incited violence against peaceful protesters at a campaign event cited Clinton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Kitchen v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:30 am
Finally, the December 2007 Marciano decision makes a cameo appearance in the New York Court of Appeals' controversial February 2008 decision in Tzolis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
In Nielsen v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
In New York v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
As this news story explains, in 2012 the defendant in the case – Michael Lustig – was arrested in connection with a “prostitution sting” involving very young girls and was eventually charged “with two federal counts of sex trafficking of a minor” in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:38 pm
Latest Analyis: Scalia v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 8:14 am
State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am
Zimmer and Halo Electronics v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Instead, we permit the government to act on our collective behalf when the democratic process, as constrained by legal protections for minority rights, empowers it to act—notwithstanding the inevitability of dissent. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Michael Ibach, M.D. and Martinson Ansah, M.D. [read post]
