Search for: "Michael Washington v." Results 641 - 660 of 2,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Kennedy, of Harvard Law School; and Michael K. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Matthew Kahn
And Peter Margulies responded to an op-ed by Steve Vladeck in the Washington Post, analyzing Kavanaugh’s military commissions rulings. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm by Rosalind Early
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:11 am by tjsllibrary
The proposed settlement would “let Google sell full access to copyrighted works that it otherwise would have no right to exploit” (Hillel Italie & Michael Liedtke). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Commonwealth Fund Blog, Joel Ario, Michael Kolber, and Deborah Bachrach discuss what a ruling in favor of the challengers might mean for consumers, while in The Washington Post Jason Millman reports that a new Gallup poll” reflecting a drop in the number of people without health insurance “is underscoring the lawsuit’s high stakes. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
’” In an essay for the Stanford Law Review Online, Michael Pierce discusses the Court’s recent decisions in Bond v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:28 pm by Stewart Baker
Michael Vatis and I pan Justice Kennedy’s gassy ode to the “Cyber Age” in Packingham v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
Marco Rubio’s tweet about Bolton’s testimony, 1/6/20 United States’ Supplemental Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:09 am by Joe Mullin
Supreme Court on Monday considered the issue of what types of technology should be eligible for patent protection when it heard oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]