Search for: "Mitchell v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 1,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 6:40 pm by Zachary Spilman
Nealy, 71 M.J. _ (C.A.A.F. 2012) and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by Susan Brenner
An Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) told him to proceed with drafting the affidavit. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what Kentucky statutes provide, and today the Kentucky Supreme Court applied this rule in Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office “The adults in the room” (direct quote) know you have to pay for patents or you’re going to get sued. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:42 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bizimana, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 (02 April 2012) R & R Plant (Peterborough) Ltd v Bailey [2012] EWCA Civ 410 (02 April 2012) AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395 (02 April 2012) Du Plessis v Fontgary Leisure Parks Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 409 (02 April 2012) Kazeminy v Siddiqi & Ors [2012]… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by Russ Bensing
Most of the talk about SCOTUS last week centered on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
The United States Supreme Court is hearing an intriguing case this week about whether Congress can make it a crime to falsely claim having been awarded a military medal, in a case testing the reach of the Constitution’s free-speech protection. [read post]