Search for: "NICHOLAS v. NICHOLAS" Results 641 - 660 of 2,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
According to the court’s opinion, this was a result largely dictated by Missouri v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:38 am by David Pocklington
Drawing upon the Scottish case Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44 and AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors [2011] UKSC 46, the Deputy Chancellor considered the nine objections that had been received by the Registry on the basis of the details they provided [10]. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:49 am by Mark Summerfield
  (A previous decision, relating to an alternative set of claims proposed by Rokt, had reached a similar conclusion: Rokt Pte Ltd [2016] APO 66.)Rokt appealed to the Federal Court, where the primary judge (Justice Alan Robertson) reversed the Patent Office decision, finding that ‘[t]he invention solved not only a business problem but also a technical problem’, ‘… there was a business problem of attracting the attention of the user and having the user choose to interact… [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:45 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Workers’ Compensation Opinions;Contract Law Opinions Body: SC18392, SC18588 - Russo v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:27 am
The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) has vacated the Administrative Judge's (AJ) decision in Miller v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am by INFORRM
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:18 am by Isabel McArdle
(1)A Chief Constable, (2) AA v (1)YK, (2)RB, (3)ZS, (4)SI, (5)AK, (6)MH, [2010] EWHC 2438 (Fam) – Read judgment The High Court has given guidance on the role which special advocates may play in forced marriage and honour violence cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:17 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  He thus ruled that the attempted attack on the frigate USS Nicholas can be prosecuted as piracy. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod maintains that Knick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
And Michael Greve on some historical and comparative-law perspectives; CSAS (George Mason/Scalia Law) December conference on judicial review of agency action with papers by Jerry Ellig and Reeve Bull, Kristin Hickman and Mark Thomson, Aaron Nielson, Nicholas Parrillo, and Jeffrey Pojanowski, full conference and video links with Andrew Grossman, Adam White, and many others; Manipulable: recent Section 8 housing case points up “how easily courts can side-step Auer deference if they… [read post]