Search for: "Novelty Inc."
Results 641 - 660
of 765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
See Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:05 pm
Swisa, Inc. that the so-called "point of novelty" test was no longer valid in determining design patent infringement. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:27 pm
Swisa, Inc. that the so-called “point of novelty†test was no longer valid in determining design patent infringement. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
" That, and your claimed novelty is repetition. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP tango) Canada OECD confirms Canada among lowest sources of counterfeiting (Michael Geist) Chile Chilean wine does not escape piracy (IP tango) China IP as loan collateral – another China innovation policy (China Hearsay) Look behind the headlines and China’s patent miracle is a lot easier to explain (IAM) Raising the bar of novelty – amended Patent Law (China Blawg) China patent series: Inventors and ownership (Maier & Maier) Europe CFI:… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
Recall # F-0017-2010
 CODE
 Lot codes: 04681, 12381, and 17181
 RECALLING FIRM/MANUFACTURER
 T R Toppers, Inc., Pueblo, CO, by e-mail on January 29, 2009. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following:1) The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal services properly;2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;3) the fees customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;4) the amount involved and the… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (Patently-O)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (Patently-O)… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 2:58 pm
("MHIA"), and Mitsubishi Power System, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:07 pm
Beard Research, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:21 am
Even though the court's judgment did not modify or expand on the law, having applied established common law principles laid down in Trek Technology (S) Pte Ltd v FE Global Electronics Pte Ltd (No. 2) [2005] 3 SLR 389 for novelty and Windsurfing International Inc v Tabur Marine [1985] RPC 59 as approved by the Court of Appeal in First Currency Choice Pte Ltd v Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd [2008] 1 SLR 335 for inventiveness, the following lessons may still be learnt from… [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:02 am
The case arose out of dispute between Star Direct, a seller of novelties and sundries to gas stations and convenience stores, and one of its former route salesmen, Eugene Dal Pra. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
Nokia, Inc., Case No. 2009-1326 (Fed. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:24 pm
Teleflex, Inc., 127 S. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
Wham-O, Inc. has had its share of hits over the years, achieving "household name" status (my opinion) with an impressive list of trademarked (I am not afraid to use it as a verb) products: FRISBEE for "toy flying saucers for toss games" HULA HOOP for "plastic toy hoops" SUPER BALL for "sport and toy balls" SLIP 'N… [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
See CIAS, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:37 am
Russian Kurier, Inc., 140 F.3d 442, 449 (2d Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 2:47 am
(c) Legal Expert Connections, Inc., 866-417-7025 www.legalexpertconnections.com [read post]
