Search for: "OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER v" Results 641 - 660 of 11,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 9:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the complaint does not state a claim and that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee alleges unlawful retaliation after reporting the unauthorized use of a State computer database by another employeeGorman v Rensselaer County et al, USCA Second Circuit, No.17-1120-cvJohn Gorman alleged that the Rensselaer County defendants in this Civil Rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee alleges unlawful retaliation after reporting the unauthorized use of a State computer database by another employeeGorman v Rensselaer County et al, USCA Second Circuit, No.17-1120-cvJohn Gorman alleged that the Rensselaer County defendants in this Civil Rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
Determining eligibility for representation and indemnification of public employees being suedSalino v Cimino, 1 N.Y.3d 166 Public Officers Law Sections 17 [state officers and employees] and 18 [municipal employees] and other local laws provide for the representation and, if found liable, the indemnification, of officers and employees of the jurisdiction who are being sued -- a significant benefit to such individuals. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:40 am by DMLP Staff
Yesterday the Digital Media Law Project, with help from the Cyberlaw Clinic, filed an amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:46 pm by Michael DelSignore
The Rhode Island Public defenders office is sponsoring legislation that would reform eyewitness identification practices. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am by MBettman
Gieske, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Hamilton County Public Defender, for Appellant Michael Smith Scott M. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:45 am by Eugene Volokh
However, the State does not allege defendant actually filmed any confidential information or undercover officers. [read post]