Search for: "PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT"
Results 641 - 660
of 75,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2024, 5:43 pm
In the case of Diarra v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
This requirement has proven to be a significant hurdle for many plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
This requirement has proven to be a significant hurdle for many plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
This requirement has proven to be a significant hurdle for many plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:37 am
In Deleon-Barrera v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:14 am
Maiers and Scott Ernest Andres have entered an appearance on behalf of the defendants. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 9:50 am
The mall, owned by Tiago Holdings, LLC, and several other entities collectively referred to as Owner Defendants, was allegedly aware of prior similar mischievous activities by youths at the location. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 9:19 am
Murthy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 8:23 am
The court then explains how the Indiana statute overreaches by imposing age authentication before accessing websites generally, rather than specific items: The Attorney General’s argument that the Plaintiff websites are inherently obscene is likewise unpersuasive….The website is a publisher, akin to the defendant in Ginzburg, not an obscene material like a magazine. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:59 am
The Corpus Christi Court of Appeals considered the issue again in Hahn v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 1:11 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 5:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:34 am
United StatesNational Rifle Association of America v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:27 pm
As discussed in a recent Texas case, Sarah Cook v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:58 am
RianoWhat Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:50 am
Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:06 am
Under Inclusive Communities: Plaintiffs have the initial burden to establish evidence that a policy or practice caused a disparate impact on a protected class; The defendant can counter the plaintiffs’ prima facie showing by establishing that the challenged policy or decision is “necessary to achieve a valid interest”; and The defendant’s “valid interest” will stand unless the “plaintiff has shown that there… [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:56 am
Plaintiff states that he received several text messages from Defendant promoting the sale of baseball tickets. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:06 am
The court declined to find that the claim was untimely asserted, correctly accepting as true the facts alleged by plaintiff concerning defendant’s continuous representation until such time as defendant advised her to retain collections counsel (see Encalada v McCarthy, Chachanover & Rosado, LLP, 160 AD3d 475, 475-476 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
Grimaldi test should apply in cases involving an artistic or expressive work where a defendant’s allegedly infringing use of a plaintiff’s trademark is not as a designation of source for defendant’s own goods and services, the author of this article argues that the constitutional-avoidance doctrine allows courts to accommodate free speech considerations when determining whether defendant’s use explicitly misleads consumers as to the source… [read post]
