Search for: "People v Brett"
Results 641 - 660
of 963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2022, 10:43 pm
The particular targets are Justices Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh, the two newest Justices. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 9:07 pm
Citing Trump v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
Under the Constitution, according to Gorsuch, judges cannot “improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:18 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who is often a key vote in closely divided cases, echoed Kagan’s concern. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:21 pm
Tanzin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
In June 2022, police arrested an armed man near the house of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh after the man, Nicholas Roske, called 911 and explained that he was planning to assassinate the justice; the FBI has alleged that Roske texted a friend beforehand explaining that he planned to kill Kavanaugh in order to “stop roe v wade from being overturned. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
But Chief Justice John Roberts (joined by Justice Stephen Breyer), Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh all wrote separate concurrences to either hold open the possibility, or to specifically endorse the idea, that the Fourth Amendment would permit warrantless entry of a home if there was a belief that medical assistance was needed or that people inside were in danger. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:29 am
Just look at Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Inforrm, IPKat and Brett Wilson’s blog had posts. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
A lot of people do seem to subscribe to this view. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
The American people rejected both Wallace and Goldwater as too extreme. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 7:40 am
In truth, it will be hard for the court's liberals not to join such an opinion, given their own anti-bias jurisprudence, especially in cases like Trump v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Amy Howe has this blog’s main report of the argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm
Austria, Wingrove v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm
In Valentine v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:40 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm
The first matter involved a website calling itself “Solicitors from Hell UK” (SFHUK), which published allegations of fraud and unethical practices (amongst other things) against a firm of solicitors (Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown [2016] 4 WLR 69). [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 6:06 am
These are places that people exercising their rights, frequent every day when they move around outside their homes. [read post]
