Search for: "People v Donald" Results 641 - 660 of 2,449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2022, 11:04 am by Ilya Somin
That argument leans on last year's 6-3 ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
  As we mention below, judgment was given in the PTR last week.is The Facebook Oversight Board has upheld the 7 January 2021 decision to ban former-President Donald Trump from the platform, after his social media activity was partially blamed for inciting the violence at the January 6 Capitol riots, in which five people died. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To see why, it helps to begin with what has been the most important administrative law case for nearly four decades.In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If you oppose slavery (and Dred Scott), you should oppose Roe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Jack Bogdanski
A famous old Supreme Court case, Eisner v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
As you recall, in December, a federal district court enjoined most of HB 20, Texas’ so-called “social media censorship” law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
”  So said Donald Trump in 2019, reflecting on his perception of the powers of his office. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Erin Molan and Nyadol Nyuon have said it would be “almost impossible” to uptake and not “useful” to most people in Australia due to the cost and effort involved, the Guardian reports. [read post]