Search for: "People v Jones" Results 641 - 660 of 2,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 9:13 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Six decades later, in the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Jones (holding that installation of a GPS device on a target's vehicle constituted a search), and Riley v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm by Lovechilde
Brett Kavanaugh was hand-picked by the Federalist Society to provide a fifth vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm by Lovechilde
Brett Kavanaugh was hand-picked by the Federalist Society to provide a fifth vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 3:45 am by INFORRM
It was a most disastrous event, the flood  rising to 5 metres and resulting in twelve people losing their lives including young children. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm by Daniel Nathan
In the Andrew Jones and James Rutten No-Action Letter, SEC No-Action Letter, 1999 WL 377873 (Jun. 8, 1999), the SEC Staff opined that the issuance of three free shares of common stock to the first one million people who register with the issuer to receive the shares, whether or not through the issuer’s Internet site, and the issuance of one additional share (up to a specified maximum) to each shareholder who referred others who also become a shareholder, was an event of sale… [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Great coverage of Navtej Singh Jauhar v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 9:45 am by NCC Staff
This week, we uncover the life of Harriet Scott, the wife and co-plaintiff of Dred Scott in the infamous case Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:24 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
But I don’t believe that a judge’s primary focus should be the answer to the question “So, defendant Jones, if I were to set bail here, what can you afford to pay? [read post]