Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
As Lord Justice Sedley rightly said “legislation like this is or ought to be written for lay people“. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:30 am
Nine people perished and there were many casualties. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:30 am
This may confuse people in and outside of the UK. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Austin & Others v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
The three categories identified by Lord Diplock in Council of the Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (essentially for review of administrative action) are not exhaustive. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:42 am
Times Democrat Publishing Co. v. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
The Act was approved by the House of Lords on Wednesday. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here), following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as Gandalf… [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition – degree of… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
He noted that two people who had reacted to the protest made by the Appellants were charged and convicted for their actions. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:05 am
Such rights are described by Lord Herschell in Abbott v Minister for Lands [1895] AC 425 at 431, as those of which a beneficiary has availed himself before the law is changed. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:41 pm
Rakusen v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:41 pm
Rakusen v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Without authority, I should have thought it would be enough to satisfy the criterion of falsity for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant made a statement which was false to a substantial number of people. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:42 pm
He cites Lord Scarman's views expressed in his opinion in R v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:32 am
By Craig JarvisLay v. [read post]
