Search for: "People v Lord" Results 641 - 660 of 1,805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
As people use technology in ways that were unknown at the time of the legislation, the powers will apply to the new behaviour. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
As people use technology in ways that were unknown at the time of the legislation, the powers will apply to the new behaviour. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:45 pm
 Including some things that I have to do.Now, thank the Lord, the reality is that even those days are usually not crushingly burdensome. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Last year, the Supreme Court of Canada held in Mouvement laïque québécois v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In other news, Ministers have been urged to reassess the law giving anonymity for people making allegations about sexual offences. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Geoffrey
  It was by Lord Donaldson in 1981: “No particular form of award is required. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday the Court will also hear the appeal of The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) – a challenge of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, Pt 4, which introduces a “named person service” requiring providers of children’s services to make available an identified individual whose general function is to promote, support or safeguard the wellbeing of each child or young person, on behalf of the service… [read post]
Thursday The Court is not sitting today, but judgment is being handed down in the joined criminal cases R v Jogee and R v Ruddock. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm by familoo
We could not just rock up at court and advise people. [read post]
Background The Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 received Royal Assent on 27 March 2014. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
His passion and enthusiasm for his subject caused him to, so to speak, “lose the run of himself” [20] The Handyside freedom of expression test, as applied by Lord Bingham in Director of Public Prosecution v Collins [2006], was whether the defendant, in exercising his right to say things or express opinions which offended, shocked or disturbed one or more sectors of the population, use language which was “BEYOND THE PALE” of what was intolerable in… [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:50 am by INFORRM
The Mosley case followed earlier High Court battles that saw the courts establish the balancing exercise between Article 10 and Article 8, in particular the House of Lords decision in Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am by UK Supreme Court Yearbook
The first two articles are from quite possibly the most authoritative people who could speak about the Yearbook—i.e., the President and Deputy President of the UK Supreme Court. [read post]