Search for: "People v Taylor"
Results 641 - 660
of 996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
See Mauldin v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Ash v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Taylor v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 8:08 pm
In Netter v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:47 pm
Moses Taylor Hospital, 2010 WL 4357308 (Lacka. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
†In lieu of granting appeal, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
It was also announced that the case of Taylor v Associated Newspapers (incidentally based on an article by, Charles Sale, the same Mail journalist as the Kenyon case) had settled and the jury trial which had been last week did not take place. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
" The law could be upheld only if the state could show it served a significant local interest that could not be furthered by a non-discriminatory law--this Oklahoma could not show.Maine v Taylor (1986) is a rare example of a Supeme Court decision upholding a state statute that discriminated against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
On Saturday 22 January it was suggested that other newspapers may also have been involved, with Mark Lewis, who acted for Gordon Taylor in his successful claim against the News of the World telling the Guardian that he was representing four people who believe their voicemails had been intercepted by other newspaper groups. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Lemley: his instinct is for standards so that they adapt, but he gets that people have different preferences. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On Friday 21 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 1:33 pm
Two other people lived at the same residence. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:51 am
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:26 pm
That's why I volunteered to work on a case for Jared Taylor, suing Twitter for banning him. [read post]
