Search for: "People v. Akin"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:56 am
In Daniels v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:47 am
True, in People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
In People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 pm
(Brady v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
The purpose of the conference was to assess the background, impact and future implications of what organiser Dr David Erdos described as ‘the most high profile data protection decision ever, which brings home to people in a new way many of the key issues we as a society need to discuss about personal information and its use’. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
The first is that he appears to have regarded his role as akin to the role of the county court judge in homelessness appeals under section 204 of the 1996 Act, in other words, as akin to a judicial review role. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:25 am
” Armstrong v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
Scott v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:15 pm
Genovese v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
State of Florida.In the meantime, the Florida Supreme Court has another, similar, matter pending before it called Hector v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
Perry, is headed up by the very formidable Neel Lane of Akin Gump. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:35 am
In Gallagher v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:34 pm
Lamparello, Adam, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
“Predictions about the future might appear to be difficult, but Niels Bohr, and perhaps three other influential people, might have been astonished to learn we have been fortunate to compile a long list of rather pragmatic predictions for the legal industry in 2015. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
., Poe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:46 am
[1] People of the State of California v. [read post]
