Search for: "People v. Bias"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The test used by the courts in assessing whether there is a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the adjudicator has come from the dissent in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
"(People v Wlasiuk,#102275 decided December 29, 2011). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:02 am
See White v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
Ford, a capital case that raises a racial-bias claim, arguing that “[t]he Supreme Court must intervene out of an elemental embrace of due process. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:06 pm
See Yan Chen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Baselines for Terry Stops In Floyd v. [read post]
Eleventh Circuit Reverses: "You're Too Religious Too" is Direct Evidence of Religious Discrimination
10 Dec 2010, 12:53 pm
The opinion is here: Dixon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
ICWA is not the exercise of federal control over Native peoples; it is an exercise of federal power over states and U.S. citizens for the benefit of tribes and Native peoples. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
The first is what might be termed “sample selection bias. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
The first is what might be termed “sample selection bias. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
TeraGo Networks Inc., 2016 ONCA 618, by Jeff Dutton, Dutton Employment Law ‘Court of Appeal finds Motion Judge’s “Sarcastic” Comments Regrettable, Not Evidence of Bias’ – September Seventh Entertainment Limited v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
You have an expert -- I know you have some questions about that expert -- but the expert saying that gender bias can creep into a system like that simply because of the natural phenomenon that people tend to feel comfortable with people like themselves. [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am
” People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I've now had a chance to review the complaint in Van Etten v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am
Most people know and readily assent to all this. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The case, Terry v. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 6:16 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:47 am
— via FisherBroyles Carlson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Political Identity v. [read post]
