Search for: "People v. Childs"
Results 641 - 660
of 6,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 6:26 am
Bishop v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:11 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 2:00 pm
(Child Custody; Neglected Child) Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Petersen v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
In People v Linzy and People v Blank, it was held that if this distinction between procedural and substantive changes in the law were mechanically applied, there would be no doubt that the repeal of corroboration laws would not be encompassed within the Ex Post Facto Clause, since such laws do not add to the legislatively defined sex crimes, do not alter the elements of existing crimes, do not elevate the punishment for existing crimes and are generally treated as… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
Likely, this is in part due to the on-going nature of custody, child support and related issues. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:14 pm
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, on July 29, 2009, July 30, 2009, August 12, 2009, October 1, 2009 and November 5, 2009 the court conducted a hearing pursuant to People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:58 am
Helmut argued because the child was his biological child, even though his parental rights had been terminated earlier, he was still a “natural parent” and he could not be charged under the kidnapping statute. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Sentencing Commission in Chicago told the panel that sentences for people convicted of possessing child pornography have become too severe. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:19 pm
Bernhardt (Land Into Trust) Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:06 pm
His information leads to agents discovering seventy-four other people involved in child pornography with whom Maier conversed during a five-month period. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 10:46 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:42 am
I consider the writing part of my job fighting for people. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 1:03 pm
See State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 pm
K.M. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 2:12 pm
Smith (Indian Child Welfare Act; Michigan Indian Family Preservation Act) The Navajo Nation v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
The People of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians (Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Sentencing) The People of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. [read post]