Search for: "People v. Deems" Results 641 - 660 of 4,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:49 am
They water it down in various ways to make it more palatable to various wavering people. [read post]
25 May 2024, 8:50 am by Russell Knight
“A trial court, sitting as the trier of fact, may only consider knowledge acquired through the introduction of evidence or through judicial notice” People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
But what makes social media platforms different is their ability to shape public discourse not by promoting their own messages but by silencing voices they deem to be harmful…. the bottleneck position that comes with control of these platforms brings with it a remarkable power to censor” By virtue of making publication decisions, every publisher necessarily “silences” the voices of people it chooses not to publish. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since a Florida youthful offender would have to register as a sex offender in Florida, the proceeding would be considered a conviction under SORA, even though a New York youthful offender would not have to register as held in People v Kuey and People v Coolbaugh. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:24 pm by My name
However, a lot has changed since 1922; professional sports leagues are now multi-billion dollar businesses that directly affect hundred of thousands of people. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:16 am by Gerard Magliocca
Yesterday I read the briefs in Virginia v Sebelius, which is the most developed lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the individual health insurance mandate. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:00 pm
Both Sentencing Law & Policy and Appellate Law & Practice have good posts about Judge Posner's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am by MBettman
The circumstances will not be deemed unreasonable even if they are deemed to have innocent explanations after the fact.) [read post]