Search for: "People v. Gray" Results 641 - 660 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by admin
Bill 1X 26; see also Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  “Gray areas” in this paper are just where enforcement hasn’t happened (yet), not where the uses might actually be legal; compare, for example, the recent approach of Canada’s Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
I can only speculate what psychological and emotional dynamics were at play in these people's lives, but infer that Elaine trusted Alan enough that she did not perceive that she needed to take vigorous steps to protect herself. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:34 pm by Ted Brooks
Once I tapped “On,”  the screen goes to a blank (no logo) dark gray color, ready to display an exhibit. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
I can only speculate what psychological and emotional dynamics were at play in these people's lives, but infer that Elaine trusted Alan enough that she did not perceive that she needed to take vigorous steps to protect herself. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
The purpose of the conference was to assess the background, impact and future implications of what organiser Dr David Erdos described as ‘the most high profile data protection decision ever, which brings home to people in a new way many of the key issues we as a society need to discuss about personal information and its use’. [read post]