Search for: "People v. Martin" Results 641 - 660 of 1,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2017, 9:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Hamilton Defending the Cobell Buy-Back Program – Rebekah Martin Intellectual Property Rights and Informed Consent in American Indian Communities: Legal and Ethical Issues– Naomi Palosaari Raising Capital in Indian Country – Evan WayNote Christman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The state is constituted by the union of people and government, and it is the state that claims against all other states the twin rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. . . . [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
The attorney for the petitioner in the first case, County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
Chief Prosecutor Brigadier General Mark Martins and James Connell, counsel for Baluchi, both confirm that they are ready to proceed on the matter. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
He begins with a note about labels: “our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are or what they are labeled. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
It is reported that the president of the Surrey Creep Catchers, a group that claims to expose people they allege are child sexual predators, is being sued for defamation. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am by INFORRM
In the meantime, the local Sidmouth Herald have published a tribute piece about Mr Martins entitled Friends pay tribute to Sidmouth Maitre De. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Hypocrisy makes people uneasy because it suggests unfairness:  someone gets credit for holding a professed view without “doing the work” of acting on, or receiving the consequences of that view.[1] This form of human perception is not necessarily wrong:  in some cases the public position is indeed a dishonest front for the speaker’s real agenda. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(The league did move the 1993 Super Bowl from Arizona because the state had refused to pass a law designating the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. as a holiday.) [read post]