Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 641 - 660
of 39,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
Personally, I think Justice Slough may be right that this might have been a relatively tiny "detail" about which the jury may not have cared (or that the victim was simply "clarifying" at trial). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
But by then, it may be too late to gain any benefit from a sentencing reduction because they already will have served the time in question. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:31 am
His IQ may well be below 70. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 2:13 pm
"Nolan Pamintuan was engaged to marry Rowena Panelo on May 18, 1996. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:15 am
It should not surprise anyone that in People v Durand (2009 NY Slip Op 04476 4th Dept 6/5/09) the Court held that under New York law it was error for the lower court to have considered "the counts of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, of which defendant was acquitted, when imposing the sentences on the criminal trespass counts (see People v Reeder, 298 AD2d 468, lv denied 99 NY2d 538; see also People v Rogers, 56 AD3d 1173,… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:03 am
As Bushnell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
This was the issue in Burgueno v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 1:29 am
William McDougald v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 5:11 pm
The appellant in in People v Magliocco ( [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Some people really like their guns, and some people really don't like any government involvement with them at all. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:47 pm
A reminder: In 1986 the Court of Appeals held that a party seeking a missing witness instruction has the burden of making the request "as soon as practicable" (People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428 [1986]). [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:32 pm
Blogger's note: Loving v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:30 am
See People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Here's what he says:"Doe entered the women’s restroom, which has two stalls, a small one and a larger one for people with disabilities. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
Talk about being unknowingly prescient . . . .This opinion was issued on May 12, 2020. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 5:26 pm
" That home search may only take 15 minutes, but the guy was nonetheless required to "remain[] within the interior premises of his or her residence during the hours designated by the correctional administrator," so he'd get custody credits for the full amount of time he was on GPS monitoring. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
And that guys like this may well be suspicious.But still. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 pm
The more modern case of Nicholson v Nicholson, 199 N. [read post]
