Search for: "People v. Mitchell"
Results 641 - 660
of 707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Peoples Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0309p.06 2008/08/22 Clemmer v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:58 pm
The NFP case is Mitchell Jackson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Are people frightened of me? [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:08 am
In its 21-page opinion in DiCarlo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:08 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 12:54 pm
In Capitol v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:39 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Supreme Court, April 23, 2008 Virginia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 8:31 am
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Street v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:53 am
People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
The Torture of Sami Al Arian Date Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 [www.masnet.org] PITTSBURG (JURIST) March 11, 2008 - Guest Columnist Peter Erlinder of William Mitchell College of Law, attorney on appeal for Dr. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mitchell, No. 06-516 Conviction for aggravated identity theft is reversed where defendant did not couple his use of the name "Marcus Jackson" a sufficient amount of correct, distinguishing information to identify a specific Marcus Jackson, as required by the statute. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:31 am
Do they want less people playing fantasy baseball? [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
No, the patent exhaustion doctrine, commonly referred to as the first sale doctrine, is triggered by an unconditional sale and was set way back in Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
