Search for: "People v. New" Results 641 - 660 of 41,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2007, 2:28 am
In order to comply with subscription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view cases listed below: People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 3:26 am
In this report in Digital Music News, Matthew Oppenheim's recent declaration that there were only 18,000 people "contacted" by the RIAA is questioned. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:57 pm
Today the RIAA filed a new witness list and a new amended exhibit list in Capitol Records v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:41 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Wired: “…People have claimed that this week’s leak of Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 11:01 am by Cari Rincker
  Many people think that since the payor (the one paying support) has a “new family,” the obligation to the first spouse will cease. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 9:45 am
  But Justice Rushing does a pretty good job of articulating the various reasons why Section 1340 might indeed best be limited to the types of "hard print" investments prevalent in old (but not new) media. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
(Though, as everyone knows, the line between permissible and "impermissible" testimony in this regard is definitely a fine one.)The Court of Appeal concludes that the officer's testimony in this case (out of San Diego) is more in the second bucket than the first, so reverses the conviction and remands for a new trial. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:37 pm
  That's a lot of scintillating news, political and otherwise, to keep one entralled.These are surely exciting times.Plus, on a less fun note, tax returns are due next week.So there's a lot of competition for our entertainment value. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
 In an unexpected -- and somewhat embarrassing -- way.It's one of the many recent cases that's forced to navigate around the various new cases and statutes that govern LWOP sentences given to minors. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
All it does is to entitle the defendant to a new trial in which the prosecution doesn't illegally dismiss a minority juror. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:04 am
 Especially when they know the lock's combination because the lock was passed down from a previous inmate to the new one. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that it's not a sufficient basis for a new trial, at least given the trial court's evidentiary findings in the present case. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:30 pm
Regardless of their race.The Court of Appeal nonetheless reverses and remands for a new trial, finding that the trial court erred by finding the prosecutor's reasons for his peremptory strike of this juror race-neutral.That's a tough one for me. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:50 pm
Today's decision is entirely consistent with the Court's 2004 ruling in People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:04 am
"How many new Medicaid enrollees were there, do you suppose? [read post]