Search for: "People v. To"
Results 641 - 660
of 72,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
But shortly thereafter, the United States Supreme Court decided Maryland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
" That's self-defense, even though it's based upon a mistake of fact.You can see why we don't punish people for that. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 8:51 am
–Martell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry… [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:48 am
Conservatives who claim to hate Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
The Supreme Court this morning has decided Snyder v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:41 pm
California's pandering statute punishes anyone who "encourages another person to become a prostitute" by "promises, threats, violence, or by any device or scheme," so it sems that if one of my goals in making the statement was to encourage people to think about prostitution rather than some other job, I'm guilty, right? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Holding that because we know that the Legislature didn't want people shooting at cars, this legislative history "breaks the tie" and means -- as in virtually every case -- that the rule of lenity is meaningless.Of course, the Legislature probably didn't want people shooting at an occupied vehicle from inside a vehicle as well -- since that may well have the same consequences (death, broken glass, car crashes, etc.) as shooting from outside. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
Allegedly looking for other victims or other people in the house. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:26 am
The Ontario government must stop requiring transgendered people to have surgery before they can change the sex designation on their birth certificates, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has ordered.Ruling in XY v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm
Although the Court in R. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
In Capitol People First v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:53 pm
The post Nude photos of youngsters get people nabbed says Fairfax criminal lawyer appeared first on Jon Katz, P.C.. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:35 pm
With oral argument scheduled for Monday in Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:20 am
Regina v O Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Those who prosecuted defendants charged with immigration offences who might be victims of people-trafficking must be aware of the protocols in relation to such victims enshrined in the Code for Crown Prosecutors; defence lawyers must make inquiries if there was credible material showing that their client might have been such a victim, especially if the client was young. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Regina v George and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148; [2010] WLR (D) 147 “Where a statute imposed criminal liability on an individual who dishonestly agreed with one or more other people to do a prohibited act, the intention and purpose was to criminalise that individual, regardless of whether those other persons were also dishonest. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:09 am
Lawyer v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm
The Court of Appeal says "Yes".Remember that the next time you try to "resolve" things informally.What's most fascinating to me about the opinion is not just that people do these things every day. [read post]
