Search for: "Posner v. Posner"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
The sharp and rapid decline of the economy that began with the financial crisis of September 2008 was expected to be followed by a sharp and rapid rise (making for a V-shaped economic cycle) when the crisis was resolved by the bank bailouts and other emergency measures taken by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department in the fall of 2008, and by the $878 billion stimulus enacted by Congress in February 2009. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:57 am
Those on the other side include Judge Richard Posner. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
The district court case is Motorola Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
DeShaney v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:47 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Weeks and Tenney v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:57 am
In Apple's patent infringement action against Motorola, Apple claimed that certain Motorola devices running the Android operating system infringe two of its network component patents. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:51 am
Chief Judge Easterbrook and Classical Law & Economics Judge Posner and Behavioral Law & Economics Practical Implications of a Supreme Court Ruling in Jones v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm
Boigues; Posner & Rosen, Howard Z. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
In Evory v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Warren, Ted Posner, and Adam Banks. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
USA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
Jumping off from a Posner decision in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:06 am
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:58 pm
Espenscheid v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 3:11 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:57 pm
In Pavey v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Judge Posner’s opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:10 pm
The opinion, authored by respected Judge Richard Posner, is McReynolds v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 4:55 pm
The failure to recognize this point (or perhaps indifference to it) was the mistake that the Supreme Court made when it nationalized abortion rights in Roe v. [read post]
