Search for: "Powell v. Powell" Results 641 - 660 of 1,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:58 am
Powell (08-1175) is the police duty to expand “Miranda warnings” before questioning a suspect. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:46 pm by Eric Muller
The question in Bravo-Fernandez is whether the collateral estoppel branch of double jeopardy law, as articulated in Ashe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
Powell, 835 F.2d 1095, 1098 (5th Cir. 1988)), the defendant has made no showing of IRS misconduct. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Justice Powell’s concurring opinion in Branzburg v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
Robert Leahy Powell, an appeal of a pretrial order suppressing evidence in possession of methamphetamine case out of Tarrant County.State's opening - Charles M. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 1:41 pm by Eric Goldman
Schedule A SAD Scheme Leads to Another Massively Disproportionate Asset Freeze–Powell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:14 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011) Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011) Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011) Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011) Bayat Telephone Systems… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm by Rick Hasen
I don’t recall seeing that detail in Justice Powell’s or Marshall’s papers, which I examined for my book, The Supreme Court and Election Law. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Mike Scarcella
The plaintiffs’ lawyers, led by Joseph Sellers of Washington's Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, has asked for an 8% cut, or $60.8 million, for the work performed in Keepseagle v. [read post]