Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 5,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2024, 2:42 pm
Hatch-Waxman established a framework for generic drug approvals in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 9:52 pm
JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, L.L.C., Defendant–Appellant. 896 F.3d 340 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:55 am
Vault Cargo Management, LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:20 pm
[Canada][Habitual residence] [Petition denied] In Watson v Watson 2023 WL 1967587 (M.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am
As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
In Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
The court notes that Wiley stated that he used the Internet and called supply houses to investigate the pricing of materials. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
By Eric Goldman Cammarata v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
See Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
" Such a result is particularly undesirable, AAI further explains, because the United States is likely to argue that "a price squeeze should be eliminated as an independent antitrust offense" - an issue that AAI "has vigorously contested . . . in its brief" but which respondents did not address. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
The government objects to the defendants' efforts to scuttle the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:44 am
In United States v. 4.85 Acres of Land, No. 07-35310 (Sep. 29, 2008), the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the trial court should not have refused to admit evidence of sales at properties nearby the property taken, even though the sales occurred after the taking. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 5:45 am
In Interactive Brokers, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
The fact that finished cell phones were sold in the United states did not amount to a “direct effect” on U.S. commerce because “the effect of component price fixing on the price of the product of which it is a component is indirect”. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:17 am
In a recent case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, plaintiffs brought a putative class action against various defendants involved in milk production, alleging they violated the antitrust laws of fifteen states and Washington, D.C. by engaging in a conspiracy to limit the production and increase the price of raw milk. [read post]
