Search for: "Prior v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 48,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2018, 1:12 pm
In a disappointing decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
The motion and memorandum in support (full text) in State of California v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:18 am
Duncan Parking Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:02 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
Prior to the final Title V permit being issued by the state, the company should be able to review the proposed permit that was released for public comment and/or the the proposed permit that the state has sent US EPA for the 45 day review. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 12:09 pm
During the pendency of that appeal the Supreme Court of the United States decided Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 4:40 pm
An audio recording of this morning's oral argument in Morales v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
A Louisiana state court has ruled in Stone Street Capital v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
A Louisiana state court has ruled in Stone Street Capital v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:35 am
Prior post here. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:14 pm
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT FELONY 4 REDUCED to Disorderly Conduct Misdemeanor- State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:39 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 9:02 pm
§ 103, was intended to tether the question of obviousness to the prior art (and untether it from judicial whim regarding "inventiveness" or "invention" as found in several Supreme Court decisions stating with Hotchkiss (and, to patent law's detriment, resurrected under § 101 by Justice Breyer and in other recent decisions from the Court). [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
Bode or State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
In the case, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:58 am
On one hand, it seems that the government should support these programs, with or without the questionable referrals; on the other hand, as stated above, it is not unfair or unusual for the government to require certain conditions prior to granting aid. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:31 am
Here is the court’s order in Cressman v. [read post]
