Search for: "REID v. Reid" Results 641 - 660 of 1,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2011, 3:27 pm by Brooke
If such were the case, “innocent travelers…would be subject to virtually random seizures…” Reid v. [read post]
  Then, following Lord Reid in Wickman v Schuler [1974] AC 235, the Court “is entitled to prefer the construction which is more consistent with business common sense” – even if this means an element of judicial creativity, which Patten LJ in the Court of Appeal felt unable to do. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Heys, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2112 (09 August 2011) Reid, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2162 (20 September 2011) Archer, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2252 (27 September 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am by Ronald London
By Erin Nedenia Reid In a departure from the recent trend of courts refusing to allow data breach claimants to seek mitigation damages, the First Circuit recently held in  Anderson v. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
Nope, nope, nope.I agree with the Court of Appeal that there was probable cause to arrest Reid Nottoli for driving under the influence. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 3:34 pm
Feel free to opine and emote about Reid's maneuver and the speech itself in the comments. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:25 pm by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch obtained the records as a result of a Freedom of Information Act FOIA) lawsuit filed on December 30, 2010 (Judicial Watch v. [read post]