Search for: "Roberts v. Brown" Results 641 - 660 of 1,864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2024, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
  Notably, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito and Kennedy dissent, the first real crack in the Court’s acceptance of Chevron. 2020 In Kisor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
On Thursday 28 July 2011, Lord Phillips, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case  Ministry of Defence v AB and others. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:24 pm
The case was combined with similar suits in other jurisdictions and taken to the Supreme Court and became the case we know as Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm
But it couldn’t post a sign that said 'No Jews allowed.'"From "Supreme Court seems to side with web designer opposed to same-sex marriage/Colorado’s Lorie Smith says being forced to create websites for gay couples would violate her right to free speech" by Robert Barnes , reports on the oral argument in 303 Creative v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 11:19 am by Scott Harman
Rachel Brown and Preston Lim discussed the issues surrounding the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Powell, Jr.Anders Walker shows how a generation of scholars and judges has misinterpreted Powell’s definition of diversity in the landmark case Regents v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:56 am
  The case of McDaniel v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 10:00 am by Christopher Schmidt
I had a finished dissertation on “Postwar Liberalism and the Origins of Brown v. [read post]
This is an historic ruling, up there with some of the other SCOTUS decisions like Brown, Griggs v Duke Power on testing and educational requirements, and same-sex marriage. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Wisconsin (earlier), see also Robert Thomas at his Inverse Condemnation blog here, here, and here; Notwithstanding SCOTUS decision in Pavan v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:15 pm
Robert Brown Jr. has this analysis of the recusals in the Stoneridge grant and the implications for the Court's consideration of the Fifth Circuit's Enron litigation. [read post]