Search for: "Rowe v. Rowe" Results 641 - 660 of 4,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
She emphasised that the question of copying is one of quality, not quantity (Ladbrokes v William Hill) and that a substantial part of a work will have been copied if the parts taken express the intellectual creation of the author (Infopaq). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm by Ashoka Mukpo
The ACLU is currently suing to end the MPP, with the 9th Circuit having heard arguments in the case, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed Alliance Pharmaceuticals Limited v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Two years ago, in Honeycutt v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 7:33 am by Sean Rohtla
The application raised four claims: “(1) that the State suppressed exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Strong v. weak corporate practice of medicine One of the tricks about corporate practice of medicine is that it varies by state and in some states the corporate practice of medicine is a really big deal. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Amy Howe has this blog’s main report of the argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
  Goldsbrough & Anor v CA Property Management Ltd & Ors (HOUSING – HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION) [2019] UKUT 311 (LC) Against whom can a tenant bring a rent repayment order application? [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in Allen v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:10 am by Alicia Maule
Reed has been on death row since 1998 for the 1996 murder of Stacey Stites in Bastrop, Texas. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:35 am by Benjamin Schwartz
For example, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act, signed into law in 2003, contained a provision requiring that the president recommend responsive legislation to Congress in the event of a “Medicare funding warning” (which occurs when the portion of Medicare expenditures paid for with general revenues—as opposed to dedicated Medicare funding—surpasses 45 percent two years in a row). [read post]