Search for: "Rule v. Simon"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
BASCA chairman Simon Darlow has used his speech at the 2015 Ivor Novello Awards to criticise current 'safe harbour' provisions in EU and US law, pointing out that the likes of YouTube undermine streaming services, and were exploiting safe harbour legislation saying this was "undermining the value of our music". [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:18 am
Owens & Anor v Grose & Anor [2015] EWHC 839 (QB) As if tenancy deposits weren’t complicated enough, now we can add libel claims to the consequences of a heated deposit dispute. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 2:30 pm
See Hart v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Ireland The Court of Appeal’s ruling in favour of a tabloid newspaper in the case of a €900,000 award against it has provided new hope for campaigners for press freedom, argues the Irish Examiner. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:42 am
Facts: This negligence case (Jakeem Roy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 11:04 am
McMonagle v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
The government’s position rests on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Walker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
Williams v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
Williams v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:28 am
Williams v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:22 am
Here’s the text of an order issued by Louisiana state court Judge Curtis Sigur last Tuesday, in Groner v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:50 am
Simon & Schuster Cellphone Spam Violates TCPA–Joffe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Simon & Schuster, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:13 am
As this case was dismissed under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, the facts are straightforward. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Aikens LJ and Simon J, [2014] EWHC 4167 (Admin) described Pham as “a British resident” and dismissed his appeal; the court held at para 91 that in its “view whether the appellant is a British citizen or not makes no difference to his relevant article 6 rights. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
At The National Law Journal (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that the Court’s ruling in Reed v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
But, on the merits of EPA’s CAA authority to adopt the sweeping CPP rules, both conservative and progressive commentators have suggested that King v. [read post]
