Search for: "Russell v State"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 11:01 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in Kansas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:00 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:00 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court this morning rejected the claim of Russell Bucklew that his unusual medical condition required the state to execute him by the never-yet-used method of mitrogen hypoxia rather than the single-drug lethal injection method of a massive overdose of a barbiturate, the optimum widely-used method for most cases.Looking quickly over the opinion, it appears to be a strong reaffirmation of the decision four years ago in Glossip v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Eight-time relist Newton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:43 am
That all changed in the January 2019 decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:37 pm
This morning’s 6-3 opinion in Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm
Soil Water Con. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jonathan Metzl weighs in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:21 am
Judge George Russell removed the preliminary injunction, stating that he is “bound by the Supreme Court’s decision to stay the preliminary injunctions in their entirety. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am
On March 7, Judge George Russell III of the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen weighs in on employment-discrimination case Fort Bend County v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm
”{See also, Russell & Anor v Stone (t/a PSP Consultants) & Ors [2017] EWHC 1555 (TCC)}The said case suggests that English law is not averse to an agreement, which provides even for extension of limitation period since the argument regarding whether the agreement had actually extended the time was considered and rejected not on the basis of whether law allows it but on the basis of construction of contract (see, Paras 46 to 56 of Russell v Stone). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:47 am
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman discusses last week’s opinion in Jam v. [read post]
