Search for: "SERVICE REPRODUCTION COMPANY"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
Why Videotron would claim to safeguard such information when it is a legal requirement to disclose it suggests that the company might want to take a closer look at both the law and the notices that it forwards. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
In Geophysical Service Incorporated v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Judge Kimball ruled that Aereo's retransmission of video signals was "indistinguishable from a cable company. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:49 am
” Estrogenically active chemicals can trigger hormone-dependent cancers, reproductive abnormalities, and other negative health conditions. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
The legal context in the present case called into consideration two provisins of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA), ie s20 (infringement by communication to the public), and s16 (as regards the issue of secondary infringement).FactsPhotographs hosted on the website of a company (Omnibill) providing escort services had been unlawfully reproduced on a competing website (www.escortgps.xxx). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:21 am
(Photo: Larry Steagall, AP)WASHINGTON — When Peggy Young's pregnancy discrimination claim against United Parcel Service comes before the Supreme Court Wednesday, the potential implications will be greater for the court itself than for Young or UPS.Several cases involving gender discrimination and reproductive rights have hit a 5-4 roadblock at the conservative-leaning court under Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am
United Parcel Service, in which it is considering whether the shipping company violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act when it rejected a Virginia woman’s request that she be put on “light duty” during her pregnancy. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
A district court determined that the storage, indexing, excerpting, and reproduction of the clips was a fair use. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:46 pm
Perhaps these examples don’t fall literally within the parameter of “dealing with communications companies” which the book indicates includes “radio and television stations,, cable and satellite distribution undertakings, telecommunications carriers, wireless companies and internet providers, as well as the postal services”. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:55 am
Remember John Steele, Paul Hansmeier and Paul Duffy, best known from reports as being the attorneys behind controversial 'troll' company Prenda Law ? [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United Parcel Service, in its October 2014 term, a case that hinges on this very paradox within the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:25 pm
Nov. 14, 2014) Ultramercial describes itself as "a technology company offering patented financial engines for monetizing online content". [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
The defendants, a UK company and its director, Mr Carter [the company has been subsequently liquidated and Mr Carter currently works as a "forklift truck driver at a warehouse for Tesco"], provide "similar and competing services" to those of the claimant, and also operate a website (www.escortgps.xxx) [Merpel wonders whether this domain name means that escorts are fully equipped with a GPS device?]. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Boon for company; better for customers who hated DRM; but in a world w/o copyright, would they be taking DRM off? [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:23 am
This provision runs against a recent judgment of the European Court of Justice ruling that hyperlinks are not a reproduction of the copyright works they link to. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
But Slep-Tone apparently won’t or can’t bring a copyright claim (indeed, elsewhere it’s being sued for infringing music companies’ copyrights in creating its karaoke CDs) so it brought trademark claims under state and federal law. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:26 am
In 2008, the company evolved from a file-sharing service to an on-demand music streaming service, its present form. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Here the owners were originally Bonner and Gordon, but often ownership is held by a music publishing company. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 2:11 pm
After the list was built, users could upload any of the eligible files to ReDigi's "Cloud Locker" service and were thus no longer available on user’s computers, but users could still stream the music. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:25 am
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 in favour of the broadcasters, ruling that Aereo and its cloud-based technology was too similar to a traditional cable company to say that its service did not infringe. [read post]
