Search for: "STANFORD V. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch, (June 10, 2016).Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Review of Beyond Church and State by Matthew Scherer, (Augustinian Studies 47:1 (2016) 114–118).Danieli Evans, Religious Objections to the Death Penalty after Hobby Lobby, (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2015).Abner S. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
Johnson Fellow:“A Legal Form of Marriage”: The Legality of Queer Families in the United States, 1830-1920 Anin Luo, Princeton University Empathizing beyond Humanity: The 1970s Emergence of Personhood for Animals and the Environment Robyn Morse, University of Virginia, John Wertheimer/Davidson College Fellow: Enterprising Value: Labor Transitions and Legal Maneuvers During the Rise of the Oil Economy in Bahrain Wallace Teska, Stanford University, William… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Douglas (Oregon State University Press, 2000), and “Marbury,” Stanford Law Review 44 (1992): 219-260. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 11:00 am
Uncovering market practices in the “new knowledge” economy, Wang maps the everyday life of copyright and piracy in relation to the emerging modern state and "new knowledge. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:21 am
[National Law Journal] * The Stanford Law Class of 1998 has the special sauce for producing female deans at top law schools. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:40 am
For those AALS and Federalist Society conference attendees who may be interested, here are the titles and times: Jan. 7, 1:30-3 PM: Panel on “What Will and Should Happen to Affirmative Action after Fisher v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Saint Michael Academy, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
"In addition to a J.D. from Georgetown, he holds an electrical engineering degree from Stanford (that's as good as it gets).While he presumably didn't have to deal with SEP licensing issues over the course of the last ten years, this case is now a splendid opportunity for him to hear FRAND arguments from two world-class litigants. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:47 pm
The case is Bullcoming v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
-Sheril Stanford [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 1:07 am
The distinction between automatic assignments and obligations to assign is nicely illustrated by the Stanford v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:47 am
Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994); United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am
” Lawson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 3:12 pm
Keller v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
The case, EPA v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 11:06 am
Stanford v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:49 pm
Similar efforts (Herrera v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 6:03 pm
This comes following the 2022 Supreme Court of the United States decision to strike down affirmative action in STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
