Search for: "STATE V. MARTINEZ" Results 641 - 660 of 1,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2021, 6:57 am
 Conducting a plain-error analysis, the panel looked to the holding in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am by Allison Trzop
Thaler, the Court held that when a state’s procedural framework makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Christine Corcos
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:26 am by Kent Scheidegger
The high court's decision to let this execution proceed bodes well for the State of Arizona's position in the pending case on ineffective assistance of counsel on state collateral review, Martinez v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
The standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531, 535 [1st Dept 1987]; see Martinez v Reiner, 104 AD3d 477, 478 [1st Dept 2013]; Beltre v Babu, 32 AD3d 722, 723 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]