Search for: "STATE v RICHARDS"
Results 641 - 660
of 8,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 7:15 am
The state’s new petition added a question on whether the Court would extend a 2012 decision, Martinez v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 10:43 am
" Grossman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:19 am
The Washington State Supreme Court has withdrawn its January Opinion in the long-running Yousoufian v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
The Court had just decided Griswold v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:47 pm
When it injected poison into the veins of William Earl Lynd, the state of Georgia restarted the machinery of death, which came to a halt as states awaited a decision in Baze v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:23 am
It seems unlikely that 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner intended his opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 12:02 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:26 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 9:50 am
The Oregon Supreme Court issued an opinion in Richard Joarnt v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Andrews in Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:56 am
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013, the White House issued a release stating that President Barack Obama has re-nominated Richard T. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:09 pm
By Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 9:02 am
by Richard Alderman The First Circuit has held, in Metabank v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 12:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
Commissioner of Correction ("This certified appeal by the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, requires us to decide whether the Appellate Court correctly concluded, contrary to the determination of the habeas court, that the petitioner, Richard Lapointe, is entitled to a new trial on the charges underlying his 1992 conviction of capital felony and other offenses because prior habeas counsel (first habeas counsel) rendered ineffective assistance in failing to demonstrate that… [read post]
