Search for: "STATE v. BREED" Results 641 - 660 of 704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
The closures are distributed across eight different states. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
In general, section 2(a) will be infringed by non-trivial state (or state-sponsored) interference with an Aboriginal sacred site. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date9  01/28/2008      01/28/2008Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.910 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed… [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
An Ohio appellate court found that a similar statute in that state allowed only people -- not organizations or other entities -- to receive money from such accounts. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm by George
Let familiarity breed contempt, not misplaced lust. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Judge Birss took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
HHJ Birss QC took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Click Here Cory King settles with state on feedlot charges. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
  It is meant to suggest the state of the global human rights project, its challenges and trajectories, and to itemize activities in states that suggest reason for "optimism" or "concern. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
Padilla was threatened with being forcibly removed from the United States to another country, including U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:44 am by Dennis Wilkins
Some religious groups want to end abortions and to allow church and state to mix more. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that the participating States in the UPC and UPCA agreement are not the same and that, in the case of the UPCA, they are not all EU Member States. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]