Search for: "STATE v. HASTINGS"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,015
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 9:24 pm
Keitner (Univ. of California - Hastings College of the Law) has posted an ASIL Insight on Germany v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
8 Hastings Bus. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:37 am
The IPKat doesn't know the closing date for completing the survey, which is why he urges haste. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:21 am
The case, State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:21 am
The case, State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 6:20 am
In Perrino v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:18 pm
The idiom “more haste, less speed” comes to mind. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
New Article: Keith Cunningham-Parmeter, Forced Federalism: States as Laboratories of Immigration Reform, 62 Hastings L.J. 1673 (2011). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
Oracle, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:39 am
As previously discussed, the Daigle v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm
Keitner, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has posted The Forgotten History of Foreign Official Immunity, which is forthcoming in New York University Law Review 87 (2012). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:39 am
Rives in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
State: The Past, Present, and Future of Education Finance Litigation in California (2005) 57 Hastings L.J. 385, 388-391; see generally Wells v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 4:56 am
Keitner (University of California, Hastings College of the Law) has posted The Forgotten History of Foreign Official Immunity(New York University Law Review, Vol. 87, June 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:15 am
Keitner (Univ. of California - Hastings College of the Law) has posted The Forgotten History of Foreign Official Immunity (New York University Law Review, forthcoming). [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:05 am
(b) Is a court of a Member State permitted to apply a national provision (here the second sentence of Paragraph 26(3) of the Law on trade marks (MarkenG)) which conflicts with a provision of a directive (here Article 10(1) and (2)(a) of Directive 89/104/EEC) in cases in which the facts of the case had already occurred prior to a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in which indications of the incompatibility of the Member State's legislation with the… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:07 pm
Unlike Summers v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010 - “Campaigns for Judicial Office: The Impact of Caperton v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
” In Illinois v. [read post]
