Search for: "STATE v. SMITH"
Results 641 - 660
of 10,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2008, 7:01 am
Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:52 am
Here is the Court's syllabus: Illinois law provides for forfeiture of movable personal property used to facilitate a drug crime, permits police to seize the property without a warrant, and allows the State to keep the property nearly... [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:12 pm
Estate of Smith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:27 am
This morning the Court will hear oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 4:46 am
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Pavan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 3:26 pm
Smith (D.R.I.); Judge Smith expresses his disapproval of D.C. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:01 am
Judge Smith ends his dissent with the following quote from Justice Scalia:"It is a regrettable reality that some federal judges like to second-guess state courts. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 5:59 am
AndrewsSC19007 - State v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 10:16 am
Smith, Director of the California Department of Public Health. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Colbert In Smith International v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
As the court stated in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:31 am
Earlier this month the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:10 pm
Supreme Court that hears only 60 appeals from the 42,000 decisions issued annually by the federal courts of appeals, not to mention the federal questions decided annually by the State Supreme Courts, see Trump v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
I'm not going to complain about Judge Milan Smith's opinion in this case. which holds that you're still a fugitive (for purposes of the period of federal supervised release) even if you're arrested on state charges.But I would like to say that I'm not all that impressed with federal supervised release if federal authorities fail to supervise -- or catch -- you when, as here, you're arrested eleven different times during this period.Sure, these arrests… [read post]
