Search for: "SU et al v. AT&T, INC. et al" Results 641 - 660 of 772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2008, 4:33 pm
CNH America LLC, et al. , a 6-page opinion on a petition for rehearing, Sr. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) before adopting an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative pursuant to Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a)? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm by Richard Hunt
Mgmt Properties IV, LLC et al, 2022 WL 2079716, at *5 (S.D. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by Sasha Romanosky
Further, in Davis et al. v Videoegg Inc., 2010 WL 3839312 (C.D.Cal.), the complaint states that “VideoEgg…set online tracking devices which would allow access to, and disclosure of [PII] …without actual notice, awareness, or consent and choice of its users…” Not surprisingly, these actions are more common in recent years, likely driven by the explosive popularity of social media, behavioral advertising and flash cookies. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]