Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 641 - 660 of 6,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
Unbeknownst to Kate, who consented to the sale but was not involved in it, David allegedly made false representations to Buckley about the property. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney is liable under Judiciary Law § 487(1) if he or she “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party,” and under Judiciary Law § 487(2) if he or she “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 12; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838). [read post]
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am by Peter Mahler
The trial court properly adopted the petitioner’s expert’s 10-year deferred gains tax on the sale of the C corporation’s fixed assets over the majority’s expert’s 100% discount for built-in gains. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:57 am by Larry
This comes from SGS Sports Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:52 am by Nick Austin and Sofia Papaspyropoulou
By virtue of OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21 and Your Response Ltd v Datateam Business Media Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 281, a trade document in electronic form is intangible and, therefore, not possessable and capable of functioning as a paper trade document. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am by Kristi L. Wolff and Jaclyn M. Metzinger
  Whether it’s food or package delivery, sale of cosmetics or dietary supplements, or another interest-earning venture, the FTC is concerned about potentially deceptive earnings claims. [read post]